Banks are using their proxies, organizations like the Bank Policy Institute and Better Markets, to promote the approval or modification of current regulation to affect the level of involvement of crypto and stablecoins in U.S. retail and institutional markets.
Banks Are Taking Action Against Existing and Upcoming Crypto Regulation
The Facts
Banks are now taking action to stop the ongoing wave of favorable regulation toward cryptocurrency and stablecoins, warning about the dangers of this phenomenon.
Two recent pieces from proxy organizations, one from the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), a membership issue with participation of Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citibank, and other from Better Markets, a non-profit with a large story of crypto opposition, follow this train of action.
“Stablecoin Risks: Some Warning Bells,” written by BPI’s senior fellow of research Marco Macchiavellli, warns about the dangers of stablecoins being ingrained in the current economy.
He states that “without closing the loophole that enables indirect stablecoin interest payments, stablecoin legislation could give the illusion of safety while leaving consumers unprotected from runs and significant losses.”
Better Markets’ Director of Securities Policy, Benjamin Schiffrin, who worked at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for 18 years, also opposes the current direction for crypto to be regulated as a commodity instead of an investment vehicle.
In a recent article titled “We Must Regulate Crypto As It Exists Today,” Schiffrin argues that cryptocurrency has no use for payments and that it should be considered just another financial asset.
He declares:
Crypto is not like a commodity and is not an alternative to money. Crypto comprises highly volatile and speculative financial assets that people acquire as investments. As a result, we must regulate crypto as investments.
Why It Is Relevant
The development of regulation that can, at last, offer crypto the opportunity of being adopted by institutions and retail across the U.S. economy is currently underway. Banks and other financial middlemen are up in arms, fearing substitution and the effects of higher levels of crypto adoption.
For example, current stablecoin regulation allows non-issuers to offer rewards for stablecoin deposits. This has introduced a rival to banks, which cannot offer the same level of yield that its crypto counterparts, posing a risk to their survival.
The CLARITY Act would also go in the way in establishing some cryptocurrencies as digital commodities, giving the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) a key role in their oversight.
Looking Forward
The fight between incumbents and insurgents in the U.S. financial ecosystem is poised to intensify as the enactment of crypto-favorable regulations under the Trump Administration becomes imminent. Expect more opposition to follow.
FAQ
-
What actions are banks taking regarding cryptocurrency regulation?
Banks are mobilizing against favorable cryptocurrency and stablecoin regulations, citing potential risks to the financial system. -
What warning did the Bank Policy Institute issue about stablecoins?
The Bank Policy Institute cautioned that legislation around stablecoins could mislead consumers about their safety, leaving them vulnerable to financial risks. -
How do organizations like Better Markets view cryptocurrency regulation?
Better Markets argues that cryptocurrencies should be treated as speculative financial assets rather than commodities, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations. -
Why are banks concerned about stablecoins and crypto adoption?
Banks fear that stablecoins, which can offer higher rewards for deposits, may compete with them and threaten their traditional business models as cryptocurrency adoption increases.
