As is known, the US Federal Reserve (FED) announced its eagerly awaited July decision and, as expected, kept the policy interest rate unchanged. However, some FED members opposed the decision to keep it unchanged.
Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack was one of these members. Speaking to Reuters, Beth Hammack explained why she advocates for interest rate increases.
Hammack stated that inflation was likely to remain high and not spontaneously fall to the 2 percent target, and therefore he voted in favor of raising interest rates at the July meeting.
Hammack pointed out that prolonged high inflation and delays in tackling it could necessitate harsher interest rate hikes in the future, saying, “The longer high inflation persists, the harder and more costly it can become to bring it down.”
Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari was one of the members who supported the interest rate increase.
Like Hammack, Neel Kashkari also emphasized high inflation, highlighting the risk of it becoming permanent.
In this context, Kashkari stated that he preferred to gradually tighten monetary policy to manage the risk of inflation becoming persistent.
Instead of concluding that stronger measures are needed if inflation remains high and waiting, Kashkari argued that it would be more appropriate to take small-scale steps now, adding that this small-scale strategy would allow the FOMC to slow down or pause without creating unnecessary impact on the real economy.
Kashkari argues that gradual interest rate increases will help manage the risk of persistent inflation.
Thirdly, Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan also supported the interest rate hike at the last meeting. Logan, too, points to the risk of high inflation and argues that early action is needed with interest rate increases.
The three officials in question had also opposed a tighter monetary policy at the April meeting.
*This is not investment advice.
