SWC counts winning allies. CLARITY still needs agreement.
The group’s scorecard lists 222 pro-crypto House winners and 19 Senate winners. Its unofficial election ratings do not establish a coalition for passage.
SWC’s election ratings count winning candidates, not votes on a CLARITY text.
- Stand With Crypto’s November 4 tally, marked updated at 9:00 a.m. ET, counted 222 House winners it rated pro-crypto and 106 it rated anti-crypto, alongside 19 pro-crypto and eight anti-crypto Senate winners. Stand With Crypto election scorecard
- Stand With Crypto’s tally showed 384 of 435 House races and 33 of 35 Senate races called; it credited Decision Desk HQ and said results were unofficial until certified. Stand With Crypto election scorecard
- The pro-crypto and anti-crypto labels describe Stand With Crypto’s ratings; its headline scorecard does not give a party breakdown of the pro-crypto winners or establish support for a particular legislative text. Stand With Crypto election scorecard
- The election scorecard measures SWC-rated candidates winning races, not a new congressional vote on CLARITY; it cannot establish enactment or a timetable. Stand With Crypto election scorecard House clerk: historical CLARITY vote CryptoSlate: CLARITY background
SWC’s own ratings, not neutral classifications or future votes. Counts are not a complete division of called races. Senate counts cover election races, not all sitting senators. Unofficial until certified; refreshed stamp is Nov. 4 at 9 a.m. ET.
Method: Reported winner counts use the same 0–250 scale in both chambers. Desktop widths equal count × 2.08; mobile widths equal count × 1.32. No percentages or party breakdown are inferred. The legislative distinction follows the scorecard’s scope and retained voting/background evidence.
The figures give crypto supporters a count of candidates the group considers favorable to the industry.
Associated Press reported at 6:26 a.m. GMT that Democrats had won the House and unified control of Congress.
In a Nov. 4 quote post, CEO of Yap Global Otto Jacobsson argued that voters had favored crypto while turning against AI infrastructure. He wrote:
“America still loves crypto, but hates the physical manifestation of AI.”
CLARITY backers among the named winners
In a congratulatory thread, Stand With Crypto highlighted endorsed candidates it said had won their races. The posts connect the broad scorecard to individual lawmakers and candidates with stated positions on crypto legislation.
The account congratulated Mark Messmer on winning Indiana’s 8th District and described him as a co-sponsor of the CLARITY Act. It also said Riley Moore won West Virginia’s 2nd District and described the endorsed representative as a co-sponsor.
The House clerk’s roll call records both Messmer and Moore voting yes when the House passed CLARITY on July 17, 2025.
SWC also congratulated Eugene Vindman in Virginia’s 7th District, saying he had backed both CLARITY and the $GENIUS Act. Vindman likewise appears as a yes vote on the July 2025 House roll call.
For Pennsylvania’s 10th District, the account said Janelle Stelson had won and had expressed support for CLARITY and $GENIUS.
The House passed the 2025 CLARITY vote 294-134, with 216 Republicans and 78 Democrats voting yes, according to the clerk. The historical breakdown shows cross-party support in that chamber.
The two sets of numbers describe how representatives voted on a bill in 2025, and which candidates the advocacy group says won the election in 2026.
CryptoSlate reported before the election that CLARITY had failed a Senate procedural hurdle in September amid disagreements involving banking risks, stablecoin rewards and customer protections.
SWC’s named winners include lawmakers with recorded support for CLARITY and a candidate who expressed support for it, but those positions do not settle the banking and customer-protection disagreements.
