As discussions continue in the US Senate on the Clarity Act, a bill regulating the cryptocurrency market, more than 100 proposed amendments submitted by members of the Senate Banking Committee have sparked a new debate.
According to information shared by journalist Eleanor Terrett, the DeFi Education Fund (DEF), an advocate for decentralized finance, argued that the changes proposed by some Democratic senators pose serious risks to DeFi technology, users, and developers.
DEF described the proposed changes as “anti-DeFi” and urged its supporters to pressure senators ahead of the Senate vote. According to the organization, the proposed changes target the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA), protections for software developers without control, DeFi front-end interfaces, tokenization regulations, and anti-money laundering (AML) obligations for developers and digital asset companies.
According to the statement, the proposed amendments were introduced by Democratic Senators Catherine Cortez Masto, Andy Kim, Chris Van Hollen, Elizabeth Warren, and Jack Reed.
Among the points that DEF particularly opposed were the rewriting of the BRCA to make it usable against developers, the removal of protections for “developers without control,” and the inclusion of digital asset companies within the definition of “financial institutions.” Some of the proposed changes also included expanding Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and AML obligations for DeFi platforms.
Related News Renowned Physicist Shares 8-Year and 20-Year Forecasts for Bitcoin Price Using the “Power Law”
Some of the proposals, particularly those introduced by Senator Chris Van Hollen, envision holding software developers who develop or publish DeFi protocols—which are thought to “facilitate” criminal activity—criminally liable. The DEF argues that this approach could directly target open-source software development activities.
Senator Elizabeth Warren’s proposed amendments aim to create specific AML and anti-terrorism financing obligations for certain DeFi businesses and interfaces. Other notable provisions include closing “gaps” in the tokenization space and defining digital asset companies as financial institutions.
Another notable proposal came from Senator Jack Reed. According to DEF, this change could pave the way for sanctions on smart contracts regardless of whether they operate autonomously or are owned. The organization believes this could put significant pressure on DeFi developers in the US.
Amendments to the Clarity Act are expected to be discussed at a hearing before the Senate Banking Committee.
*This is not investment advice.
