Nick Timiraos, a journalist known for his close ties to the Fed, wrote that discussions within the Fed regarding the interest rate path have reached a critical turning point.
Accordingly, officials are now discussing not when interest rate cuts will begin, but under what conditions interest rate increases might be needed again.
The statement released after the latest policy meeting signaled a significant shift in the Fed’s communication language. Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, Cleveland Fed President Beth Hammack, and Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari formally objected to maintaining the statement that “the next step will most likely be an interest rate cut.” This was noted as a rare divergence in the Fed’s history.
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, whose term is nearing its end, acknowledged in a post-meeting statement that there had been “intense discussions” within the committee. While stating that they had not completely removed the guidance due to procedural reasons, Powell explicitly indicated that the Fed’s stance had shifted from a dovish to a more neutral position. He also said that the arguments of the dissenting members were “completely valid.” These statements suggest that the Fed is gradually moving away from signals of interest rate cuts and adopting a “wait-and-see” approach.
The key factor behind this policy shift is the shock to energy markets. In particular, the supply disruption due to the de facto closure of the Strait of Hormuz has heightened concerns that energy prices could remain high for an extended period. According to experts, this situation represents not just a temporary price increase, but also a structural risk that could push overall inflation expectations higher.
Related News How Will Jerome Powell’s Departure as Fed Chair Affect Bitcoin?
Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari, in his recent speech, drew attention to this scenario, saying that if the Bosphorus does not reopen soon, interest rate hikes may be back on the agenda. According to Kashkari, while these steps risk weakening the labor market, combating inflation will remain a priority.
On the other hand, former FED economist William English criticized the current policy stance, stating that keeping interest rates steady while inflation rises amounts to “passive easing” and is not sustainable in the long run.
The last time a challenge of this magnitude to the policy statement was seen in September 2020. The current debates are expected to intensify under Kevin Warsh, who is anticipated to take over as FED chairman in mid-May. The first FED meeting after Powell’s term ends will be a critical test for the direction of monetary policy.
*This is not investment advice.
