A new international survey from Stanford University’s Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) Institute reveals a growing global divide in public sentiment toward AI. While interest in AI technologies continues to surge across Asia, Western countries show more restrained confidence in their benefits.
A ‘Great Divide’: Asia Leads, West Lags in AI Optimism
According to the findings, 83% of respondents in China view AI products and services as more beneficial than harmful. This represents the highest level of optimism globally. Similar sentiment is seen in Indonesia (80%) and Thailand (77%), where majorities express confidence in AI’s positive impact.
AI Optimism — defined as seeing AI products & services as more beneficial than harmful — is at 83% in China but only 39% in the U.S. This is what those EA billionaires bought with their propaganda money. pic.twitter.com/l3I450og9a
— David Sacks (@DavidSacks) November 10, 2025
Western nations, by contrast, report lower levels of trust. Only 40% of Canadians, 39% of Americans, and 36% of Dutch respondents consider AI beneficial overall.
Despite this caution, the report does show a slow improvement in sentiment. Positive attitudes have increased by 10 percentage points in Germany and France since 2022. Both Canada and Great Britain saw 8-point gains, while the United States recorded a 4-point gain, signaling a gradual shift in perception.
Related: AI Crypto Sector Leads Market With NEAR, TAO, FIL, and Story Among Best Buys
The accompanying Ipsos dataset from 2022 to 2024 displays these changes, showing a constant, region-specific rise in AI confidence as exposure to practical applications, including productivity tools, automation systems, and governance technologies, increases globally.
Buterin: Divergence Mirrors Other Emerging Sciences
Following the report’s release, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin noted this divergence is not unique to AI. He referenced a related global survey highlighting a similar pattern of public trust in other emerging sciences.
Here’s one that comes to mind: pic.twitter.com/rT5dL33Eiy
— vitalik.eth (@VitalikButerin) November 11, 2025
Citing Pew Research Center’s International Science Survey (2019–2020), Buterin pointed to views surrounding gene-editing research as an illustrative comparison.
The Pew data shows approval for gene editing is highest in India (56%) and Taiwan (44%). Japan records the lowest regional belief at 26%.
In the Americas, Canadians (60%) and Americans (60%) align closely with Brazil (63%). European responses vary widely. France (75%) and Germany (68%) show high approval, while Italy and Poland display stronger ethical reservations.
Related: Vitalik Buterin’s Six-Month Roadmap for Ethereum: Faster, Fairer, and With AI
Disclaimer: The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.
