-
A coalition of 125 crypto groups is pushing back against U.S. Senate efforts that could tighten stablecoin rewards rules.
-
The dispute centers on whether Congress should expand the GENIUS Act’s ban beyond stablecoin issuers to platforms and apps.
-
Industry leaders warn that changing the rules now could hurt consumers and tilt payments back toward traditional banks.
A new policy fight is taking shape in Washington.
More than 125 crypto and fintech organizations, led by the Blockchain Association, have urged the U.S. Senate Banking Committee to reject efforts that would expand restrictions on stablecoin rewards under the GENIUS Act. The group warns that broadening the rules would hurt consumers, slow innovation, and give traditional banks an unfair edge.
The letter was sent this week to Senate Banking Chairman Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, pushing back against proposals that seek to reinterpret the law’s ban on stablecoin “interest or yield.”
What the GENIUS Act Allows and What It Doesn’t
The GENIUS Act clearly prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest to token holders. But according to the coalition, Congress intentionally allowed platforms and third parties to offer lawful rewards and incentives.
“That distinction was not accidental,” the letter states, arguing that expanding the ban would “reopen a settled issue” and disrupt a carefully negotiated compromise.
Crypto groups say this is a fundamental change to how stablecoins can compete in payments.
Banks Warn of Deposit Risk – Crypto Pushes Back
Banking groups have argued that stablecoin rewards could drain deposits from the banking system and hurt lending, especially at community banks. Some estimates have projected potential deposit outflows of up to $6.6 trillion.
The coalition disputes those claims, pointing to a Charles River Associates study that found no evidence of disproportionate deposit outflows from community banks between 2019 and 2025.
They also note that banks currently hold about $2.9 trillion in reserves earning interest at the Federal Reserve, raising questions about whether deposit constraints are the real issue.
“Opposition to stablecoin rewards reflects protection of incumbent revenue models, not safety-and-soundness concerns,” the letter says.
3/ Efforts to restrict stablecoin rewards in the midst of productive bipartisan collaboration on market structure legislation would reopen a settled compromise, inject uncertainty into regulatory implementation, and undermine confidence in newly enacted financial legislation.
— Blockchain Association (@BlockchainAssn) December 18, 2025
Why Stablecoin Rewards Matter Now
With average checking account yields near 0.07% and savings accounts around 0.40%, the coalition argues that stablecoin rewards help platforms share value directly with users, especially in a higher-rate environment.
The group also warned that reopening the issue before GENIUS rules are even written could undermine confidence in crypto regulation.
“When Congress passes a bill, and it gets signed into law, if you can reopen it right away, you’ve got a question about how much certainty is that really bringing to the market,” said Blockchain Association CEO Summer Mersinger.
This is an important fight for the industry. Stay tuned to Coinpedia for what’s next
