Jason Lowery recently made bold predictions on Bitcoin’s price based on emerging proof-of-work theories.
In a tweet that has not yet been deleted, Lowery noted that the market is still in the early stages of grasping the computer science behind reusable proof-of-work networks. Frequently purging his social media content is something Lowery is known for due to his strict privacy, security, and professional situation as an active serviceman in the United States Space Force.
He outlined his “Digital Gold Theory,” suggesting that this framework will drive Bitcoin’s price to $1 million per coin by around 2030. Lowery added that once the public fully recognizes deeper constructs—such as “Power Projection Theory” and “Digital Matter Theory”—Bitcoin’s valuation could surge to $100 million, emphasizing that many remain unaware of what lies ahead.
“Digital Gold Theory will get the price of “Bitcoin” to $1M per “coin” by ~2030, but the real fun starts after that, when the public begins to understand and accept the deeper theoretical computer science behind PoW that has begun to emerge over the last few years, like “Power Projection Theory” and “Digital Matter Theory.” That will be when we see the price run away to $100M.”
Lowery clarified that he does not assign a precise timeline to the $100 million forecast. He indicated that the target might not materialize until as late as the year 2100, underlining his view that the strategic importance and total addressable market of what he terms “digital power” and “digital matter” far exceed the traditional notion of “digital gold.”
These statements integrate technical speculation with broader market implications, inviting a reassessment of Bitcoin’s valuation framework. Lowery’s projections suggest that Bitcoin’s future price is not solely a function of supply and demand but may also reflect a gradual shift in public understanding of its underlying proof-of-work mechanism. The forecast posits that as market participants begin to appreciate the nuances of these emerging theories, Bitcoin’s price could experience a dramatic realignment.
Lowery’s commentary resonates with themes he has advanced in earlier work on Bitcoin’s role within national security and digital defense. His advocacy for conceptual frameworks that extend Bitcoin’s relevance beyond a mere store of value aligns with discussions on the broader strategic potential of proof-of-work networks.
His ideas have contributed to a growing discourse that views Bitcoin not only through the lens of financial scarcity but also as an asset with implications for cybersecurity and national defense. Mike Siers’ AuthLN project, which uses Bitcoin and the Lightning Network to secure critical infrastructure using Bitcoin capital, is a prime example of Bitcoin’s possibilities. CryptoSlate caught up with Siers on a recent episode of the SlateCast to discuss AuthLN and Bitcoin’s future role in cybersecurity.
Integrating technical theory with market forecasting reflects a broader trend in the digital assets space. Valuation models are increasingly incorporating factors traditionally associated with technology and strategy. The potential transition from a “digital gold” paradigm to one that embraces “digital power” and “digital matter” signals a shift in how investors might assess the role of Bitcoin in a digitally interconnected and defense-conscious environment.
Lowery’s lack of a strict timeline for the $100 million prediction further accentuates the speculative nature of these forecasts. By distancing the higher target from near-term expectations, he implies that the evolution of Bitcoin’s valuation may be as much about gradual theoretical breakthroughs and public recognition of new computational paradigms as it is about immediate market forces. This perspective encourages market participants to look beyond conventional metrics and consider how advancements in proof-of-work theory could eventually reshape investor sentiment.
Lowery’s tweets serve as a catalyst for further discussion and highlight a future in which Bitcoin’s price trajectory might reflect not only traditional market forces but also the gradual maturation of theories that interlace digital asset fundamentals with national security considerations.
