Bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI infrastructure as revenue per megawatt from serving AI workloads runs 5 to 10 times higher than from mining Bitcoin, and the post-halving squeeze has turned that gap into a strategic mandate.
Singapore Summit: Meet the largest APAC brokers you know (and those you still don’t!).
The clearest signal so far is Bitfarms (NASDAQ: BITF), which announced it is re-domiciling, renaming itself Keel Infrastructure, and halting all new Bitcoin mining investment.
“We are no longer making any investments into Bitcoin mining,” said executive Ben Gagnon, framing the company as an “infrastructure developer and owner.”
We’re officially Keel Infrastructure! Built for the accelerating demand for HPC and AI—with the power, locations, and execution to deliver.
Explore our new website → https://t.co/3VI028F01M pic.twitter.com/D6ubEMP1lc— Keel Infrastructure (@keelinfra_) April 1, 2026
A Clear Trend
It’s not a one-off case. Core Scientific (CORZ) and TeraWulf (WULF) have largely repositioned as HPC operators and signed multi-year contracts with hyperscalers.
Riot Platforms (RIOT), Iris Energy (IREN), and Hut 8 have each announced plans to redirect significant power capacity toward AI clients.
Analysts estimate that by end of 2027, up to 20% of the Bitcoin mining industry’s total power capacity could be repurposed for AI and HPC workloads.
Why Miners Have an Edge
The pivot works because miners already hold what the AI industry can’t quickly acquire: large-scale sites with high-voltage power contracts and the infrastructure permits to match.
Hyperscalers are facing two-to-four-year delays just to get new data centres grid-connected. Miners can bring AI capacity online in one to two years.
Goldman Sachs forecasts U.S. data center power demand growing at a 15% compound annual rate through 2030, driven predominantly by AI.
The Valuation Play
The financial logic is as important as the operational one. Bitcoin miners typically trade at 6–12x EBITDA. Data center operators trade at 20–25x.
A successful transition from volatile commodity production to infrastructure-as-a-service — with long-term leases and predictable cash flows — implies a substantial multiple re-rating. That’s the bet these companies are making.
For brokers and investors, the practical consequence is sector reclassification. What traded as a pure-play crypto mining cohort is becoming a heterogeneous mix of infrastructure companies, AI-levered real estate plays, and residual Bitcoin producers.
Applying uniform crypto-cycle logic to the entire group is increasingly the wrong frame.
