Making sense of crypto.
NBTCNEWS

Account claiming ties to Elon Musk’s son launches Solana memecoin, reaches $13M market cap before plunging 86%

An X account claiming to represent Elon Musk’s son launched Solana token $MAX, which reached an estimated $13 million market cap before falling 86% after Musk unfollowed it; the identity claim and alleged family connection remain unverified. On-chain analysis found 47 wallets accumulated about 16.8% of supply, with 26 buying within two minutes of launch, while reported early traders profited and some buyers said they lost as much as $50,000.

By NBTC3 min read

An X account claiming to represent Saxon James Musk, Elon Musk’s son, launched a Solana memecoin called $MAX. The token reached a market cap of around $13 million before losing 86% of its value after Musk unfollowed the account.

The account’s identity claim remains unverified. The Musk family has neither confirmed nor denied a connection, leaving traders with a token tied to a name no one can vouch for.

From follow to freefall

The events began on November 10, 2026, when Elon Musk followed @ChainChomp131. At the time, the account had about 5,000 followers, a modest audience by X standards.

The account launched $MAX on Solana around November 11 or 12. Within 48 hours, the token had climbed to a peak market cap of about $13 million.

The token’s theme was a dog named Max, allegedly owned by the Musk family. That connection, like the account’s claimed identity, has not been verified.

Musk then unfollowed the account. The token fell 86%, almost immediately wiping millions off its market value.

The account responded by removing evidence. It deleted promotional posts about the coin, including a video encouraging potential buyers to “Have fun.”

The wallets that were early, very early

On-chain data suggests a less spontaneous launch than the account’s activity implied. Analysis found that 47 wallets, grouped into eight clusters, accumulated approximately 16.8% of the $MAX supply.

Of those wallets, 26 bought the token within two minutes of launch.

The operators reportedly made around $2 million in profit before the price collapsed. They gained on one side of the trade while others took the losses.

Individual traders reported substantial losses. Accounts including @rasmr_eth and @Aurelius0121 said they lost as much as $50,000 each amid the price swings.

Mainstream outlets largely overlooked the story. Coverage remained mostly on niche and crypto-focused platforms, in keeping with the episode’s rapid pace: the token rose and fell faster than a typical news cycle.

What this means for traders

The $MAX episode brought together several familiar memecoin risks in a single 48-hour window: an unverified identity, a borrowed celebrity signal, a pet-based theme and a concentrated group of early holders.

The wallet data offers the clearest lesson. When roughly a sixth of a token’s supply goes to coordinated hands within minutes of launch, later buyers often provide the exit liquidity. The clusters bought first and could sell first.

The identity question also matters. Claims of family ties to a public figure are easy to make and hard to disprove in real time. The Musk family’s silence left traders to fill the gap with assumptions, and the price reflected those assumptions until the unfollow punctured them.

The deleted promotional video adds another wrinkle. When projects remove their own marketing after prices turn, buyers have little to hold onto beyond the token itself.

share preview

Sharing is disabled in this private preview. Nothing has been sent.